I’ve recently fallen in love with going to the library again. The TBR pile is teetering, and most of the books that I’ve bought recently have been to do with aspects of writing, or of engineering, as I try to bring both my text book on materials characterisation and the shared novel with Debs to a successful conclusion (and start thinking about the next projects…). But I can just about justify getting books out of the library, although I may be in danger of developing an L-TBR pile… The problem*, of course, with going to the library is that one way or another, you end up browsing. Either it is deliberate as you attempt to take stock of what is new, or you are deliberately looking for something specific – which is not there – and you end up tripping over something else that grabs your attention.
*I use the term in a loose sense: it is not a problem per se, but there are a range of difficulties that can arise.
A little while ago, I wrote a review of ‘The Appeal’. If you read the post, you’ll recall that I spotted it in the library and picked it up because I’d heard a lot about it. The conceit that provides the structure to the story is that it is formed from a selection of emails that have been made available to two pupils of a barrister. He wants them to review the documents and come to a conclusion as to whether or not the right person was arrested for a crime. In my review, I likened it to the earlier book ‘The Documents in the Case’ by Dorothy L Sayers. I also mentioned that whilst I’d heard of it, and whilst I’ve read several of her Lord Peter Wimsey stories, I’d not read this one. Back in the library, looking for something else, I spotted the Documents in Case, and the Appeal still relatively fresh in my mind I thought that I would give this a go.
Sayers is perhaps best known for her detective fiction, although she did a lot more than this, and in her detective fiction, she is best known for Lord Peter Wimsey. Her record in this regard might owe something to her status as a founder member of the Detection Club, an organisation that probably deserves a post of its own. (The English Heritage Blue Plaque outside a former residence probably doesn’t help either, labelling her as a ‘detective novelist’). Together with some of the brightest stars of the Golden Age of detective fiction, Sayers set out to refine the genre, and having done so to experiment with it. For example, a group of members wrote a joint detective story, each taking responsibility for a chapter, and then passing it along to the next person, who must build the story in such a way as to incorporate all clues (either proving or debunking them). Each contributor also wrote their own solution to the crime, which remained sealed until the mystery was complete; these solutions were included in the book, for the general reader.
What I hadn’t realised until now is that Documents is itself an example of a shared piece of writing, the co-author being Robert Eustace (a pseudonym for Dr Eustace Barton, who also wrote medic-legal fiction). The epistolatory novel was not invented by Sayers, but this is certainly a piece of experimental writing on her part, a departure from the formula she was developing with Lord Peter. It is interesting to note that she herself was unhappy with the final form of the book. Coming to it as a Lord Peter fan, I have to say that I didn’t enjoy it as much as I expected. It lacks a great deal of the humour to be found in Lord Peter’s adventures. Then, too, I felt that some of the material presented was something of a cheat: the documents collected are various, but several represent quite lengthy statements from some of the involved parties, solicited by the son of the deceased, who is attempting to determine if his father has been murdered.
On that basis, I don’t think I can offer a general recommendation to hurry out and get a copy. Still, if you happen to be interested in detective fiction and are looking for something a bit different, or if you happen to stumble across it in a library whilst browsing for something else, it’s probably worth a couple of hours of your time.
Have you read Documents in the Case? Would you recommend it – or not? What’s the most unusual detective fiction you’ve read?
©David Jesson, 2022